ARM of FATE


I recently learned of a low-cost, ARM-based board called the Beagle Board. I have been entertaining the idea of purchasing one for testing FFmpeg via FATE. It wouldn’t fit into the current FATE paradigm, though. I envision that another machine would have to cross compile the ARM binary and then tell the Beagle Board to execute the series of tests using the binary.
Posted in FATE Server | 3 Comments »
October 14th, 2008 at 6:49 pm
I have one and the thought of letting it run FATE did cross my mind (but only after we are done with FATE on Windows). I lended it to someone for now, but I’m getting it back in mid-December.
It might be a good idea to let it run the tests on Mans’ NEON-optimized branch instead of vanilla FFmpeg.
October 14th, 2008 at 7:05 pm
Is there a good reason that Mans’ branch is not part of the main tree?
October 15th, 2008 at 3:23 am
I have two Beagle boards, and I’m not using one of them much, so I could let it run FATE tests. That’s assuming you can fit a cross-compiler into the process somehow.
The reason the NEON optimisations are not yet merged is that I couldn’t prove beyond reasonable doubt that further improvements are impossible.