{"id":626,"date":"2008-11-16T22:05:20","date_gmt":"2008-11-17T06:05:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/multimedia.cx\/eggs\/?p=626"},"modified":"2008-11-17T09:26:29","modified_gmt":"2008-11-17T17:26:29","slug":"arm-netbook-in-the-works","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/multimedia.cx\/eggs\/arm-netbook-in-the-works\/","title":{"rendered":"ARM Netbook In The Works"},"content":{"rendered":"

Apparently, I won’t have to revise the entire architecture of FATE<\/a> in order to test FFmpeg<\/a> on ARM via the Beagle Board<\/a>. I have been reading some stuff about how ARM will release chips suitable for netbook devices<\/a>, and how Canonical has signed on to make sure that at least one Linux distribution runs competently<\/a> on said devices.<\/p>\n

I’m excited about this for 2 reasons: I like netbooks (whereas no conventional laptop has ever managed to interest me) and because I retain an innate fascination with alternate (i.e., non-x86) CPU architectures, architectures that are often difficult to work with due to unavailability of hardware and appropriate tools.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Apparently, I won’t have to revise the entire architecture of FATE in order to test FFmpeg on ARM via the Beagle Board. I have been reading some stuff about how ARM will release chips suitable for netbook devices, and how Canonical has signed on to make sure that at least one Linux distribution runs competently […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[101],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-626","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fate-server"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t