<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LLVM Recognition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/</link>
	<description>Topics On Multimedia Technology and Reverse Engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 18:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-149055</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multimedia.cx/eggs/?p=1489#comment-149055</guid>
		<description>ignore &quot;doesn&#039;t&quot; in the last part. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ignore &#8220;doesn&#8217;t&#8221; in the last part. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-149054</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multimedia.cx/eggs/?p=1489#comment-149054</guid>
		<description>Why aren&#039;t you building OS X versions with GCC 4.2.1 as included with Leopard also? I&#039;m getting good results with 4.2.1.

However I&#039;m trying to compile with LLVM-GCC under Snow Leopard and getting strange results.

My AVCodecContext doesn&#039;t misses apx 80% of all options, like -vcodec is all gone and a lot more other important ones. Any ideas or should I just stop trying..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why aren&#8217;t you building OS X versions with GCC 4.2.1 as included with Leopard also? I&#8217;m getting good results with 4.2.1.</p>
<p>However I&#8217;m trying to compile with LLVM-GCC under Snow Leopard and getting strange results.</p>
<p>My AVCodecContext doesn&#8217;t misses apx 80% of all options, like -vcodec is all gone and a lot more other important ones. Any ideas or should I just stop trying..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-147675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multimedia.cx/eggs/?p=1489#comment-147675</guid>
		<description>And hopefully the the end of this year&#039;s GSoC Open64 will be able to build FFmpeg as well. That should be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And hopefully the the end of this year&#8217;s GSoC Open64 will be able to build FFmpeg as well. That should be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat</title>
		<link>http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-147448</link>
		<dc:creator>mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 07:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multimedia.cx/eggs/?p=1489#comment-147448</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

use --arch=c : llvm as very borken asm inline support.

For other failure, may be update llvm.

A version of ffmpeg build with &quot;--cc=&#039;clang -ccc-host-triple i686-linux-gnu&#039; --enable-gpl --arch=c --disable-debug&quot; an llvm (r72387) pass codectest on x86_32</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>use &#8211;arch=c : llvm as very borken asm inline support.</p>
<p>For other failure, may be update llvm.</p>
<p>A version of ffmpeg build with &#8220;&#8211;cc=&#8217;clang -ccc-host-triple i686-linux-gnu&#8217; &#8211;enable-gpl &#8211;arch=c &#8211;disable-debug&#8221; an llvm (r72387) pass codectest on x86_32</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kostylev</title>
		<link>http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-147250</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kostylev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 09:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multimedia.cx/eggs/?p=1489#comment-147250</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say this is a masterpiece of the deadly optimization:

--cc=clang –-disable-sse -–disable-optimizations --extra-cflags=&#039;-O1&#039; -&gt; 237/262
--cc=clang --disable-optimizations --extra-cflags=&#039;-O1&#039; -&gt; 237/262
--cc=clang --disable-optimizations --extra-cflags=&#039;-O1 -fomit-frame-pointer&#039; -&gt; 255/262</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say this is a masterpiece of the deadly optimization:</p>
<p>&#8211;cc=clang –-disable-sse -–disable-optimizations &#8211;extra-cflags=&#8217;-O1&#8242; -&gt; 237/262<br />
&#8211;cc=clang &#8211;disable-optimizations &#8211;extra-cflags=&#8217;-O1&#8242; -&gt; 237/262<br />
&#8211;cc=clang &#8211;disable-optimizations &#8211;extra-cflags=&#8217;-O1 -fomit-frame-pointer&#8217; -&gt; 255/262</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multimedia Mike</title>
		<link>http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-147197</link>
		<dc:creator>Multimedia Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multimedia.cx/eggs/?p=1489#comment-147197</guid>
		<description>Nice legwork, Michael. Is it miscompiling ASM stuff all over the place? Or something else? And I wonder if this applies to assorted other configurations that are experiencing problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice legwork, Michael. Is it miscompiling ASM stuff all over the place? Or something else? And I wonder if this applies to assorted other configurations that are experiencing problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kostylev</title>
		<link>http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-147187</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kostylev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multimedia.cx/eggs/?p=1489#comment-147187</guid>
		<description>x32_86/Linux
--cc=clang -&gt; 155/262
--cc=clang --disable-sse -&gt; 209/262
--cc=clang --disable-mmx -&gt; 209/262
--cc=clang --disable-mmx --disable-optimizations -&gt; 262/262</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>x32_86/Linux<br />
&#8211;cc=clang -&gt; 155/262<br />
&#8211;cc=clang &#8211;disable-sse -&gt; 209/262<br />
&#8211;cc=clang &#8211;disable-mmx -&gt; 209/262<br />
&#8211;cc=clang &#8211;disable-mmx &#8211;disable-optimizations -&gt; 262/262</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astrange</title>
		<link>http://multimedia.cx/eggs/llvm-recognition/comment-page-1/#comment-147179</link>
		<dc:creator>astrange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://multimedia.cx/eggs/?p=1489#comment-147179</guid>
		<description>Could you run gcc svn/PPC with -fno-strict-aliasing once and see how many tests are fixed? I think it should be most of them.

There should really be dsputil unit tests to make it easier to find this kind of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you run gcc svn/PPC with -fno-strict-aliasing once and see how many tests are fixed? I think it should be most of them.</p>
<p>There should really be dsputil unit tests to make it easier to find this kind of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

